WEDDING PLANNER

"You're the envy of your future sister-in-law Janice... whom I overheard say at the last gown fiitting, " Look at those thighs. I'd kill for Tracy's thighs." This is the first sentence I found very interesting in the movie. You know that "thigh" means the top part of the leg between the knee and the hip.While Mary was saying this sentence to Janice, I could not get the meaning of it.Although, I have comprehended the meaing of that, I cannot explain it to you know:) I will try again and again, and I will write it here, I promise:)

And what about these:

- " Earwax." "X" on a double letter.

-"A" on a triple word. Seventy-two points.

-No, I challenge you. " Earwax" is two words."

-It's one.

- You're bluffiing.

Actually, most of the utterances in the movie were like these. THey were all enjoyable and nice to hear. The sentences were so smooth. I did not have much difficulty while I was watching it. The accents of characters were mostly British English accent. Even if you do not know the meanings of the vocobulary, you can deduct them from them from contexts. NonetheIess, I cannot say that I really recommed you to watch this movie. Anyway, you will like it very much if you ara fun of romance films. I am one of them:) And I always try to watch such kinds of movies. I like them:)

Please, look at this sentence of Steve:)

"Maria, I know I'm a pain in the neck. I just wantyou to be happy." I have not heard such a usage. This is an idiom. And it tells the whole thing. You do not have to know he previous or followng sentences:) You can deduct that Steve is regretful about his behaviors. He knows that he always talks about events and makes comments on the issues:)

When it comes to the story, it is very romantic. Nevertheless, I cannot continue writing before I mention the acting of Jennifier Lopez. She is wonderful. She has done her job perfectly for me. However, I cannot say the same thing for the whole movie.'The Wedding Planner' is one of the most horrendous film experiences I've ever had the immense displeasure to sit through. It starts poorly, gets progressively worse, and treads water for only a few seconds.

Of course, we're expected to appreciate that Mary and Steve are the ones who should really be together, but it's tough to give a monkey's when the pairing is so completely devoid of any sort of spark or chemistry. Mary Fiore has been a dedicated and highly successful wedding planner for five years, effortlessly controlling everything involved in the festivities. In fact, so much of her time is taken up by her profession that romance has been absent from her personal life for two whole years. That all changes when she has a strained meet with doctor Steve Edison, who saves her from a runaway garbage cart. Following a magical night which they spend watching an old movie in a San Francisco park, Mary is appalled to discover a couple days later that Steve is engaged to marry her latest client, Fran. Forced to work with the couple as she plans their wedding, Mary cannot help but fall for Steve, who is likewise beginning to have doubts about Fran being "the one" for him.
The romantic comedy genre is one that you don't really expect to be unpredictable. In almost all cases, the two unlikely lovers end up together in the end. Because of this, it is vital that the film exhibit at least sweetness and entertainment value. You will not find something very different from this. Then, lets watch it and gve your own decision. Perhaps I am wrong:)

YOU HAVE MESAGE IN A BOTTLE!!!

"l could always steer for home when you were my home." This is the first sentence that sounded me very interesting at the beginning of the movie. I had not known the meaaning of 'steer for something' until I learnt that it means 'to move on a particular direction'. This is the first word that I learnt in this movie:) When Terresa is reading the mesage in the bottle, there are nice explanations that draw may attention very much:) For example:

"You came into my dream last night with that smile...

... that always held me like a lover...

...rocked me like a child.

All l remember from the dream..."

Actually, this is a nice movie. You can find that the concept of 'love' is depicted in a different way. At first, it seems to be a very familiar story, but once you continue watching it, you find uncommon nuances in the realtionship of two lovers.the story starts on a deserted New England beach, where Teresa as a divorced mother with a young son is taking a stroll. During her stroll, she spies a glass bottle out of the wet loam. Picking up it, she finds a typewritten note inside addressed to a woman named Catherine, whom the unknown writer deeply misses. Moved by the heartfelt and stirring words of love lost, Teresa shows the strange letter to her coworkers upon her return to the Chicago Tribune. There, she works as a researcher.

Seeing the potential for a great human interest story, Teresa's editor decides to run the letter as a front page item. Suprisingly, the letter's publication generates an overwhelming response from Tribune readers, who send hundreds of pieces of fan mail in support. While reading lots of mails with her best friend Lina, a couple of letters pick their interest. These letters are from individuals who found two similar letters stuffed in glass bottles.

While arranging her research resources, Teresa finds out the originator of the mysterious messages. It is a shipwright from North Carolina named Garret Blake, who lost his wife Catherine two years prior. Desperately wanting to better know the man, Teresa git on the next plane and finds herself in the peaceful seaside village where Garret calls home. Pretending to be a tourist, Teresa strikes up a fast friendship with the grieving shipwright, in search of material that she can use for writing a follow up piece. However, Teresa gets more than she bargained for when she falls under Garret's spell as she comes to understand the man and his unforgettable loss. Unfortunately, as the relationship between Teresa and Garret deepens, so does the risk of Teresa's true motives being revealed.

Although it has so much spectacular, what I did not like about is that the core of the story, the romance between Garret and Teresa lacks emotional resonance. It id not something memoriable. The performances of the characters are not so much good.

Another shortfall of the film is that there is no sense of urgency to the proceedings. While the issue of Teresa publishing the letters in the Tribune eventually becomes a source of contention in the relationship, it is not a major source of complications. In fact, the scene in which Garret inevitably finds out the truth comes across as overly-melodramatic and his reaction seems to be implausibility. Had Teresa gone to find Garret with a story deadline hanging over her head, and if the letters had made Garret a national celebrity assuring him a thorough hounding by the popular press, then the stakes of the relationship and its consequences would have been higher. Consequently, the dynamics of the relationship would have been more interesting, and the struggle to keep the relationship alive would have been worth fighting.

If you're looking for an old-fashioned romance with two beautiful but bland people, you might find "Message in a Bottle" adequate. Other than some nice scenery and some interesting character bits from the supporting actors, "Message in a Bottle" is an overly-long and emotionally-manipulative movie:)

" I'm taking her out tomorrow morning."

"Test saiI. Round the point and back." are the other sentences that Drew my attention.

IS NOVEMBER ENOUGH TO LOVE SO MUCH?

Humans need to face hard situations to realize that the best things in life do not have to do with money, but these simple things are important to human life. We can find a good example of this situation in the film called Sweet November. The main characters of the movie are Keanu Revees as Nelson Moss, and Charlize Theron as Sara Deever. Through this movie, I became conscious that money cannot fulfill our lives and that there are things with more value than money that can make us happier.
This movie starts when Sara and Nelson meet each other while they are taking a test to renew their driver’s licenses.

Nelson Moss is a hard-working man. He is very dedicated to his work. As I concluded, he has most probably lost value of the other things in life that make it worth living. While renewing his license at the local DMV(something like that:) ) Nelson has a chance meeting with Sara Deever. This event is very interesting and funny actually:) Sara is thrown out of the testing center for responding to a question that Nelson whispers to her. Without a license, she persuades Nelson to act as her chauffeur one night. That night has a special meaning. Because she breaks into an animal shelter and save two puppies from being put to death. As a joyous, beautiful, young woman, SARA has learned not to take life for granted for even a second. Sara AS a result, she presents Nelson with a proposition. For the entire month of November, she will invite him to move in with her, and spend every minute with him. Nelson thinks she's crazy.

After a failed meeting the next day and a nasty confrontation with his boss, Nelson finds himself fired from his job. To make matters worse, Anjelica leaves him. With nothing to lose, Nelson finally accepts Sara's offer. Her goal, of course, is to make him a better,humane, person. As Nelson gradually falls for her, Sara is frightened to find herself attracted to him in a way she never has before.

.. . . While living with her, Nelson falls in love with Sara, but still does not know that she has an incurable disease (which is never named in the movie). When Nelson finds out about her disease, he gives her all his support and tries to be with her all the time. Sara thinks it would be a good idea to help him to improve his life, so she proposes that he moves into her apartment to undergo a spiritual rehabilitation. After Sara meets Nelson, she notices that he is a self-centered and humorless man, whose life revolves around his work and that he is living only superficially. Sara refuses to be with him and asks him to leave her, telling him that he has to continue without her, and that his life is already better because he has learned the real value of life.

People work to get all those material possessions that never will fill their spirits, but we need to leave the materialism behind and start becoming a better person. I realized that money is not everything and that what we have right here, right now, is the only thing we can ever be sure of, and that money can not buy the most valuable thing on this world, a life. This movie made me realize that the best things in life are concentrated in those things that we do not usually pay attention to, things that seem simple, things that have no economical value, but are really the most important things in our life, such as, the feeling of freedom or just the beat of our heart. Life could change in a second, and we had better enjoy those things that life offers us for free.

The aspect of the movie I appreciated the most was the lesson I learned through this film. Nelson at first rejects that proposition, but after all Sara’s insistences, he agrees to live with her and accept that proposition. For example, in this movie, Nelson never thought that the woman who changed his life, the one he really loved, was going to died, and he could not use his money to save her. In this movie, Sara Deever, a woman who is living her life as simply as she could, and dying from an incurable disease, knows Nelson Moss, who is the typical money obsessed advertising executive man but who changed because he realized that the money has not the value it seem to have. From that day, he goes back to his life, but this time knowing the real meaning of living.

The language in the movie is not difficult to understand. I was able to catch most of the words and sentences..Some of them were very interesting to hear for me:)

For example, while watching the movie at home, Nelson tried to change the channel. At that moment, Angelice entered and he said:

" Us...Right..Hey, is not there some kinda limit on us talks? You know, one okay, two is necessary, three, cruel and unusual."

While Sara and Nelson were going in the car, Sarah said that: "Does your mother know you treat women like hookers? Or did she raise you to think being nice means patronizing the whole world?" In this sentence, I had not known the meaning of the hooker, nevertheless, after having looked at it, I realized that it means bad woman.

In the movie, most of time, Sara said "Yup!" It represented that Sara was not pleasant the condition happening that moment, therefore she used it in order to show her feeling. One of the scenes, again while she was with Nelson in the car, She said that: "Yep, Face it. It is your fault. I cannot drive. The least you can do is schlep me somewhere. It is quick, painless..." Actually, have you known the word 'schlep' ? I have not heard it before. It means someone who is dense.. This wasa another word that I learnt with this movie:)

Again, in one of the scenes, while Sara and Nelson was at home, it was raining very much. Nelson went out. Sara immediately follwed him and said that he should wait a second. Nelson turned and said: "I have no words to describe how totally whacked you are!" Here, most probably whacked means something negative. When I looked up the dictionary, I found that it means being tired very much. Nevertheless, after the sentence of Nelson, Sara got angry very much and said: " What are you so pissed of about! " 'Piss of' means 'damn you'. Therefore, 'whacked' is much more then what it means... Why do not yu help about that? Perhaps you know the exact meaning of it, or you may have much better idea:)

WONDERFULL!!!!

"Life Is Beautiful" is wonderfully written. When it tries to be funny, it is hilarious. In one very pointed scene, Guido, hoping to find someone who opposes the fascists, quietly asks another man what his politics are--before the question even registers in the man's head, he addresses his children by name: Benito and Adolpho. Still, not everything works against Guido; the scene where he finally wins over Dora is absolutely perfect. All this comedy works very much in the film's favor. I have no qualms about saying "Life Is Beautiful" is better than "Schindler's List;" and it boils down to the comedy. Guido's clownish nature makes it even harder to watch what happens to him in the concentration camp--but by the same token. it gives him a defiant air that's very satisfying, and helps relieve the oppressiveness of the totalitarian state that looms over everyone in the film.

Just watching the film, you can tell that it was a labor of love for the actors. Two stand out in my mind: the first is Giorgio Cantarini, who plays Joshua. Though he's a little old for the very early scenes, he carries off the later scenes beautifully--it's really hard to believe so young a child can act so effectively. Roberto Benigni, however, is the true creative genius who pulls the film together. In addition to his masterful work co-writing and directing "Life is Beautiful," he also stars in it; he won my heart within his first minute on screen.

If "Life Is Beautiful" has a weakness, it's the translation. There were several places where the subtitles seemed a great deal shorter than the spoken lines--and one where I thought I caught a name that didn't make it into the subtitle. Despite this problem, the subtitles are preferable to a dubbing. Beyond the traditional arguments regarding the value of hearing the original actors--which I'd say apply more to "Life Is Beautiful" than any other foreign film I've seen--there would be a thorny translation problem with the fact that some minor characters speak English or German--languages not understood by the characters they're addressing; it would become confusing if the other characters spoke English instead of Italian--as would happen if the film were dubbed.

I think the main basis is the strong thematic content relating to the holocaust. The worst violence is all off screen--in a way, it's more jarring than most films' depictions on screen; the big exception is a scene involving a stack of corpses. I didn't catch any nudity or coarse language--though I don't speak Italian, so the latter may have been lost in translation (but I doubt it). The real problem for children is they'll probably will lose patience with the subtitles. That's a shame, since all else being equal, I'd say the film would be a good family film: the film's moving depiction of some of the worst events in history, and the depiction of Guido and Dora's great--even heroic--love for each other and their son, both weigh heavily in its favor.

Still, calling it a family film doesn't do "Life Is Beautiful" justice. One often thinks of family films as bland. "Life is Beautiful" will make you laugh plenty, cry some, and think. It's uplifting, charming, and creative. I honestly can't think of a word against it.

NOT AS GOOD AS OTHERS:(

Before watching Shrek, I told a friend of mine that out of all of the recent sequels coming out in Hollywood this year, that Shrek the Third had the potential to be an extraordinary bust. I knew that, going in, but stood to my guns to keep an open mind and try to watch the movie and like it for what it is. And what that was, was a bust. It definitely was a let down, all within the first 15 minutes of this film and it was never able to pick up the pieces and put together anything resembling the first two Shrek movies:(

This version of Shrek had huge shoes to fill. Shrek 2 was one of the most comical animated movies that I have ever seen and the first Shrek was equally as impressive with its combination of pop references and gags that even a 5 year-old kid could pick up on. The gags or ‘gas’ ran out on this one.
The movie starts off pretty funny as Prince Charming (voice Rupert Everett), disgraced after a failed attempt to steal our hero's wife and becoming heir to the throne of the kingdom of Far, Far Away, is forced to relive his humiliation night after night in a dinner theater production. Adding insult to injury, his dressing room is in the alley. Upon learning that Shrek (voice of Mike Myers) is filling in as king, Charming decides to try to go after the throne again with the help of other fairy tale villains.

Shrek and Fiona (voice of Cameron Diaz) have a difficult time ruling. After a failed knighting, christening, and royal introduction, they retire for the night, only to be notified of the frog King Harold's (voice of John Cleese) imminent death. On his death bed, Harold names Shrek the new king in a prolonged death scene for a frog followed by a chorus of the things singing a Wings song. But before the King ‘croaked’, Shrek was able to get info out of the king and he mentions that a young boy named Arthur is next in line after Shrek for the throne.

Having no intention of becoming king, Shrek, with sidekicks Donkey (voice of Eddie Murphy) and Puss in Boots (voice of Antonio Banderas), sets off to find Arthur and bring him back, but as they're setting off, Fiona reveals she's pregnant.
This is where the so-called plot thickens. Shrek not only fights off his responsibility as king but he now has to fight his fears of becoming a father himself, and there's even a very funny dream sequence that has him trying to handle a swarm of baby ogres as they’re puking, crapping, and causing mischief all over the place.
Arthur or Artie’s off at Worcestershire, a high school where he's hated by everyone, including the leader of the jousting team Lancelot (Arthur’s supposed right hand man in other adaptations of the King Arthur legend) and the girl he's always loved Guinevere (King Arthur’s queen in other adaptations), or Gwen, as he calls her.
Justin Timberlake provides the voice for Artie. His character is strictly used as a plot device to try and movie along. There’s no connection to him as a character and he’s definitely a character that you don’t want to see in Shrek 4, which unfortunately I just found out was in the preproduction stages of development. Timberlake's performance doesn't help matters much.

Soon, the gang is shipwrecked on an island where they meet Merlin, Artie's old magic teacher who had a nervous breakdown and has gone bonkers.
Although this show has a ton of characters, its major problem is the lack of story and gags that didn’t work. Shrek the Third provides only mild entertainment, with the laughs trickling down as it plods toward an ending that's far less than "happily ever after" at least for weary viewers despite the reliably game efforts of the A-list vocal cast. Granted, there are still plenty of amusing, even laugh-out-loud funny moments sprinkled throughout Shrek the Third, but compared to the first two films, Shrek the Third is sadly third-rate.

The narrative momentum and comic energy begin right about the point Shrek and his sidekicks begin their quest for Artie, who's an exceedingly bland addition to the cast of characters. The idea of the once and future King Arthur as a bullied high school nerd, kicked around by "Big Man on Campus" Lancelot is no more than mildly amusing; and the film's laugh-free spin on the wizard Merlin as a befuddled, aging hippie feels positively stale.

Characters wear out their welcome or the sub-plot regarding Shrek's worries about his impending fatherhood. I never once bought into Shrek not really wanting fatherhood. Never felt for his character once on this. Felt like the filmmakers were trying to force a new emotion on Shrek to try and add his character added depth, which he didn’t need. Shrek was already the most developed character in the series by far. Hello, the name of the movie is Shrek for goodness sakes.

The filmmakers should’ve taken that energy used to develop Shrek’s character and focused elsewhere like say on the Disney princesses. They were not so much good for me. Why were they there? I understand that they were trying to focus on some sort of feminist movement slash Charlie Angels thing going on, but it was a little over the top. And was Fiona’s mom there? It seems like she was there the whole movie but only said two words. Way to earn a paycheck. All in all, Shrek the Third was a bit dissappointment for me. Neertheless, there are good things too. As expected, visually Shrek the Third delivers fantastic computer generated imagery. Stunning landscapes, fluid motions and a keen attention to detail are all accounted for. Yet, I couldn’t help but want more.

The graphics, while extremely well done, are basically the same as the previous movies. I’m from the school of going above and beyond and I felt the animators should have added a new ‘WOW’ factor. You can’t sit on your past triumphs in this town if you want to stay ahead of the game.
Also, as expected, we’re given a very healthy dose of adult humor, wrapped around innuendos and read-between-the-lines dialogue (we’ve got to trick the children of course). As with all movies, some jokes hit and some miss. Mostly, the antics in Shrek the Third are singles intermixed with a few doubles; the only home run I can think of was during the Pinnochio interrogation — even I was getting confused with all the double speak. Yet as stated previously, while there are funny moments, I’ve basically seen the same material in the first two movies.

The language is very clear to understand. The accent of Shrek is Scottish. In his these speeches, to understand that is not so much difficult.

" Give me that! Your fiying days are over.That's 20 pieces of silver for the witch. Next!"

"Okay, fine. Attention, all fairy tale things. Do not get comfortable. Your welcome is officially worn out. In fact, I'm gonna see this guy Farquaad right now and get you all off my land and back where you came from!"

"I'm not the monster here. You are. You and the rest of that fairy tale trash, poisoning my perfect world. Now, tell me! Where are the others?"

While he is saying "going, coming, doing", she drops "g" sound, and he prounces it as /k^mın/. And, the prouncation of "r" sound is also different. As you now, the Americans prounounce "r" which is alveolar trill. Also, while they are speaking it is easy to hear "r" sound especially the ones at the end of the words. Shrek' s prounciation it is not same with the Americans'. While he is saying "monster....", he prounces the word "cover" as /manstı'/. From this aspect, it is same with British. Additionally, there are some nuances between the porounciation of vowels. While he is saying "world", he pronounces it something like this "wıld" not as /w3:ld/, "because" as /bıkoz/....etc. I

GREEN MILE REFERS TO NAME OF THE DEATH ROW, DO YOU KNOW?

Well-meaning and well-acted, but also with wonderful secenes, The Green Mile is a movie that feels and thinks it is bigger than it is....Actually I have read its book. And when I compare both of these, I want to mention that it is an epic, and would have been much better had the filmmakers realized the quiet dignity and limited scope of what they had to offer. The problem lies at that point. I should note that I often enjoy quiet, well-acted movies.

I think Before Sunrise is a wonderful movie, I whole-heartedly enjoyed Nobody's Fool, I think a Simple Plan was one of the ten best movies of the 1990s... I mean, each would have been better with some prison scenes, but they were good nonetheless. Why? Because each accepted that the essence of what they had to offer rested with the nature of the characters. The Green Mile isn't satisfied with that. It thinks it wants to make big statements about the nature of faith, the possibility of redemption, and the responsibilities of authority. As a result, it misuses strong performances by Michael Clarke Duncan, David Morse, and Tom Hanks.

The movie begins and ends with completely unnecessary framing sequences set in the present. The bulk of the movie is told as a flashback set in the 1930s. Setting the movie in the 1930s and cutting out the beginning and end would have been much more effective.For the ones who do not know the movie, it will be beneficial to tell it:) The Green Mile tells the story of a year in the lives of guards and prison inmates on a death row in a Louisiana prison. At first, I could not get understand, but later, I recognized that The Green Mile refers to the name of the death row because of its green floors. Tom Hanks plays Paul Edgecomb. Paul is a very respectful person. He has a some kind of dignity. Therefore, seeing such kind of a person in the position of a prison guard was suprising for me. Nevertheless, this is a fact that Tom Hanks does his role very well:)

David Morse plays Brutus. Brutal and Paul run a kinder, gentler, death row. Their goal is to make the condemned men pass the last days in a respectable, dignified manner. Actually many times I asked the question "Why do they care so much about a group of men whose sole common characteristic is having committed so dreadful acts as to deserve to the death sentence?" I never got a direct answer. Perhaps they think there is nothing more dangerous than a bunch of criminals with nothing left to lose. But sure, it is much more than that. Paul is also simply a decent and humane person. For men like Paul and Brutal mistreating the prisoners is inconceivable.

Everything changes with the arrival of three men, one is a bad guard, the second is a giant prisoner, the third is a sociopathic killer. The guard, Percy Wetmore is a coward and a sadist.I confess that I did not like him..He is such a bad person that his words and behaviors made me crazy...Also, I believe that he does not deserve his position because he owes his position to political connections. What is much worse was his fondest wish is to see a man die up close. He is reaaly a sadist!!! Paul does not also love Percy and o of the scnes he said for Percy:

"Percy is mean, careless, and stupid.Yup. And boring. He doesn't grow. He doesn't learn. He just is."

More interesting is the first new prisoner.His name is John Coffey. And Michael Clarke Duncan plays that role. John Coffey is my favorite:) He is so sweet. His apperance combine with his character very well:) He is a seemingly simple-minded, giant, black man. He was found guilty of the rape and murder of two little white girls. Needless to say, he would never have survived long enough to be sentenced to death in real life:( The movie tellss Coffey's innocence right from the start. He is respectful and obviously gentle. His guilt is scarcely conceivable. Would the movie have been better for allowing some doubt in the matter at least early on? I don't know.

Yes, Coffey is capable of miracles, specifically healing the sick. But does that make Coffey happy and be away from sadness? NO:(

Oh yeah, there is also a mouse :) Here, the mouse mostly provides comic relief. Indeed, the mouse's reappearance at the end of the movie is, um, laughable and detracts from the solemn feel the movie is trying to develop:) I advise you to watch the movie:) You will like it..The accents of the people in the movie are not difficult to understand:) I understood most of the things:)

WHEN YOU FEEL YOU DO NOT HAVE ANOTHER CHOICE BUT JUST LEAVE...

This is one of the movies that I have not been able to forget since I watched it for the first time. This was the second time I watched it. It is so much romentic that I like it very much:) I do not know whether you have noticed it or not that most of the films I wrote about here are romantic ones.That is because I love watching romantic films and I usually choose that kind:)

This movie tells the story of two people whose ways get crossed one day..Actually, this is a fact that with this movie I began to admire Hug Grant..He is so much nice on the scenes:) The character he plays in the movie is Will Thacker. Will is the owner of an bookstore in Notting Hill.He is handsome and clever.He has divorced but there are some problems about his divorce and he has difficulty in dealing with it. He has a roommate whose name is Spike. I am sure that most of you have watched this movie, therefore you are most probably familiar with this name. And even if you have not watched it, please and please watch it. Spike is very strange person and you should see him:) He is ver much eccentric. I do not know it is the real reaon but his speeches are very very different may be because he is Welsh. I got the impression that he is as if he imitates the other artists:) Anyway, this is what makes watching him enjoyable..

There is also another important character whose name is Anna Scott. She is world-famous Hollywood actress. She is very beatifula and everybody admires her..One day, Will encounters Anna Scott.Ana Scott comes to London for a trip. While Will is in his shop dealing with books, Anna Scott comes his shop to purchase a book.After that day, actually shortly thereafter:) , these two collide in the street accidentially. As as result, Will drops .....juice( I did not pay attention thing in is hands) on both himself and Anna. He feels very sorry and offers Anna his house where she can change her clothes. Anna accepts the offer and they go to his house. Nevertheless, there happens a strange event. After Anna changes her clothes, she kisses Will.

Days pass after that event. And Will cannot forget her. When he comes home, he asks if there is any message for him.Because he has not written down anything ( most probebly he has forgetten to write:) ), he cannot remember anything. Nevertheless, he rememebers an American called Anna called him a few days previous. In her message, she wants Will to come and visit her. After having heard that, he immediately goes to the hotel she is staying. And at that moment, everything gets mixed:) Because when he goes there, Anna's room has become the centre for a press day and as a result, Will is mistaken for a member of the press. Then, he gets panic and he claims he works for a magazine.So that he gets in a difficult condition. Because people think that he a journalist, he interviews every memeber of Anna's new film in order not to make people be suspcious of the condition.As a personal comment, you should see him on that secene:) Even though he has not seen the film himself, he interviews with actresses and actors about the film, which is really funny:)

While dealing with this condition, Will cannot talk with Anna. Therefore, he invites her to his sister's birthday party. There, Anna feels at home with Will's friends. She finds them very friendly and warm.After that day, Will and Anna do go out together. They do lots of thing together involving going to cinema and to the restaurant. After these, one day Anna invites Will back to her hotel roo. Nevertheless, in the room,they come across Anna's boyfriend. After seeing him, Anna immediately asserts that they have broken up but Will decides to leave anyway.This a big sadness for me. But as the film goes on, new things begin to occur.

Days later, one day comes to Will's house.This visit is not for anything but to find a place to stay. Some of her photoghraphes have been foun by he press and therefore she needs to be hidden.With this event, Will and Anna come together again. That night, they sleep together. While they are at home, sweet Spike is on a bar:) What he does is really suprising:) Instead of not speaking about Anna, he talks about her being in their home. As a result, in the morning when Anna and Will get up, they see lots of reporters at their doorstep. And at that moment, Anna leaves in a hurry. (This secene was a sad one for me. When I thought that they came together again, and they would be happy forever, seeing that was not a happy thing for me.Also believe me the condition of Will was worse than me.) After her leaving, Will decides once and for all to forget her.

Later, Anna returns to England to make a Henry James film, which Will had suggested she do. She invites him to the set of the film and he listens to the sound recording. While he is listeneing to that, Anna is very busy with her work. Nonetheless, there hppans another shoking thing for me and for Will. While Will is listening to recording, he hears Anna's co-star. She explains him that Will is just some guy. After having heard that, Will leaves. The next day, Anna comes to the bookshop once again. She expects that they will come together again and will continue their relationship. Neverthelessi Will does not accept that.Afterwards, Will consults his friends on his decision. Then, he realizes that he has just made the biggest mistake of his life. He and his friends search for Anna in London. They reach Anna's press conference before she leaves for the United States. And the happy end:) Will successfully persuades her to stay in England with him. What is more, and the best, they get married. The last secene is magnificent: Will and pregnant Anna is sitting on a park bench in Notting Hill:)

Although I am sure most of you have watched it, anyway I recommend you to watch it again, Believe me, each time someone watches it, he can find a different and nice point:)